در اصل 170، ابطال مقررات مغاير با ش

در اصل 170، ابطال مقررات مغاير با شرع، به ديوان عدالت اداري سپرده شده است، لكن بايد توجه داشت كه «ابطالِ‏» مقررات مغاير با شرع، با «تشخيص‏» مقررات مغاير با شرع متفاوت است. به همين دليل، ماده 41 قانون ديوان عدالت اداري مصوب 1385، مقرر داشته است كه ديوان در مورد مغايرت يا عدم مغايرت مقررات دولتي با احكام شرعي، بايد از شوراي نگهبان استعلام نمايد.[5] بنابراين، تشخيص مغايرت با شوراي نگهبان و ابطال مقررات مغاير، با ديوان عدالت است.

結果 (英文) 1:

On the contrary, the principle of waiver provisions of the Sharia with 170, Supreme Court Justice, has been entrusted to the Office, but it should be noted that «ابطالِ» ", in contravention of regulations with diagnostic of a religious» regulations contrary to the Sharia. For this reason, the Office adopted by the Supreme Court of Justice, article 41 of law 2006, mandates that have been set in the case of governmental regulations controlling or non-controlling religious rulings, with the Guardian Council should call.[5] therefore, the diagnosis of the Guardian Council and the annulment of the provisions incompatible with the contrary, Supreme Court Justice.

結果 (英文) 2:

170 In principle, nullification is contrary to the provisions of the Shariah, is entrusted to administrative justice court, but it should be noted that "revocation" in violation of the provisions of the Shariah, the "diagnosis" contrary to the provisions of the Shariah is different. Thus, Article 41 of the Law on Administrative Justice Court Act 1385 provides that the court case against government regulation of religious orders in contravention or failure, should the Council to inquire. [5] Therefore, the detection and cancellation provisions inconsistent with the Council contrary, the Court of Justice.

結果 (英文) 3:

In the principle of 170 cancellation regulations contrary to canon law administrative justice to the Supreme Court, but it should be noted that the "Florida" regulations contrary to canon law with diagnosis regulations contrary to canon law is different.For this reason article 41 law Administrative Justice Court act of 1385, has decreed by the court in the trends are inconsistent or lack of governmental regulations of the canonical with the Guardian Council inquiry.(5) Therefore contradicts the diagnosis with the Guardian Council invalidated regulations contrary to, with the Supreme Court justice. Simplicity